Flow Conditioning Devices

Selecting the right configuration for ultrasonic flow meters indeed poses various challenges, as highlighted in the detailed explanation. The factors to consider, such as swirl, crossflow, and pressure-loss implications, underscore the complexity of this process. The trade-offs between different conditioning devices, including their impact on axial profile, sensitivity to flow changes, and pressure loss, are effectively outlined. This information provides valuable insights for those involved in selecting and configuring ultrasonic flow meters. 


Balancing your ultrasonic flow meter setup precisely can present challenges. Factors like swirl, crossflow, and pressure-loss penalties must be carefully weighed when selecting the appropriate conditioner to uphold the accuracy of your operations.
 
For example, chordal ultrasonic meters with four paths, utilizing Gaussian integration principles, are resilient to changes in the axial profile but are vulnerable to swirl and/or crossflow common when flow changes direction in a pipeline system.
 
Tube bundles, often employed in liquid applications, boast lower pressure loss in turbulent flow compared to conventional plate conditioners. Nevertheless, they can negatively impact the axial velocity profile and pose challenges in maintaining consistent manufacturing quality. Additionally, tube bundles lead to increased pressure losses in liquid applications within the laminar regime.
 

2013 Flomeko Technical Paper

CALDON BFC Product Sheet

 

More details
Back To Top

Send Enquiry